Jeffrey Wasserstrom: China, Xi Jinping, Trade War, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Mao | Lex Fridman Podcast #466

Jeffrey Wasserstrom: China, Xi Jinping, Trade War, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Mao | Lex Fridman Podcast #466

Mao vs. Xi: Cults of Personality and Leadership Styles in Modern China

Both Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping have cultivated powerful cults of personality in modern China, yet their approaches diverge significantly in tone and strategy. Mao’s leadership was characterized by an intense, emotional appeal that often embraced chaos as a mechanism for radical transformation. His rule encouraged societal upheaval and mobilized the masses in unexpected ways, drawing on cultural symbols like the Monkey King to inspire revolutionary fervor. This approach created an environment where disorder was celebrated as a transformative force, leaving a legacy of unpredictability and fervent loyalty among his supporters.

In contrast, Xi Jinping’s leadership style adopts a far more controlled and orderly persona. His personality cult is meticulously curated through state media channels, including published collections of his speeches, which serve to reinforce his image as a stable and responsible leader. Xi’s approach is deeply rooted in traditional Chinese governance ideals, invoking the long-standing influence of Confucian thought to emphasize hierarchy, order, and well-established societal norms. This shift from chaotic mobilization to measured, state-controlled messaging reflects broader changes in China’s political climate and the evolving needs of the Communist Party.

Historian Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s analysis underscores that while both leaders operate under communist ideology, they mark distinct eras in Chinese politics. Under Mao, the cult of personality was wild and transformational, encouraging rapid societal change through unorthodox means. Under Xi, however, the emphasis is on stability, predictability, and the careful balancing act between traditional Chinese values and the revolutionary legacy of the past. This contrast not only highlights their differing personal approaches but also mirrors the shifting priorities within China’s internal and external narratives in a time of significant global and domestic challenges.

Confucian Roots and the Legacy of Meritocracy in Chinese Governance

Drawing on Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s insights, the podcast highlights how Confucian thought and the legacy of meritocracy have long shaped Chinese governance. Confucianism, with its emphasis on hierarchical yet reciprocal relationships, has provided a conservative framework that continues to influence political life in China. This tradition underscores the idea that rulers and ministers, as well as citizens at large, are bound by mutually respectful duties—a stark contrast to the chaotic and revolutionary approaches seen in other periods of Chinese history. By invoking this venerable philosophy, modern leaders like Xi Jinping are seen as reconnecting with a deep cultural heritage, positioning themselves as caretakers of a time-honored system rather than radical reformers.

The podcast discussion emphasizes how this Confucian heritage is reflected in China’s longstanding commitment to meritocracy. The ancient civil service examinations, which later evolved into today’s Gaokao, illustrate the idea that intellectual achievement and educational rigor are the rightful paths to power. This meritocratic system, rooted in Confucian ideals, was originally designed to promote fairness by rewarding scholarly achievement—a principle that once enabled social mobility and excellence. However, Wasserstrom also points out the inherent challenges within this ideal. Over time, the system has produced pockets of inequality, as those with better access to education and resources have gained a disproportionate advantage. This tension between the noble promise of meritocracy and its practical shortcomings resonates in today’s China, where elite networks and instances of corruption continue to provoke public discontent.

In this historical continuum, Xi Jinping’s leadership can be seen as an attempt to reconcile and reinvigorate these Confucian principles while navigating modern political realities. His administration actively draws on the imagery and legitimacy of China’s ancient scholarly traditions, thereby merging revolutionary zeal with cultural conservatism. This blend of past and present reflects a broader narrative in which China’s political identity is continually redefined—balancing the transformative impulses of Marxist legacies with the orderly, merit-based ideals inherited from a Confucian past.

Historical Contradictions: Nationalism, Anti-Scholarly Trends, and Cultural Memory

China’s historical narrative is rife with contradictions that blend nationalism, anti-scholarly tendencies, and a powerful cultural memory. For example, early imperial figures like the anti-scholarly First Emperor, notorious for burning books and suppressing intellectual thought, set a precedent for state power that rejects traditional academic values. Later, Mao Zedong would implicitly invoke some of these anti-intellectual methods—choosing disorder and radical mobilization over the careful, meritocratic process prized by Confucian scholarship—even as he drew on nationalist sentiments to rally broad popular support. This tension between rejecting scholarly traditions and relying on a storied cultural past creates a unique paradox in Chinese political thought.

At the heart of this contradiction is the use of nationalism as both a tool for modern statecraft and a means of disavowing the very scholarly traditions that once underpinned Chinese intellectual life. On one hand, figures like Mao promoted upheaval and chaos to challenge the old order, celebrating a brute form of power that echoed the First Emperor’s disdain for academic elitism. On the other hand, modern leaders such as Xi Jinping have adopted a more balanced approach, reintroducing elements of Confucian philosophy to lend a sense of continuity, stability, and legitimacy to their rule. Xi’s calculated revival of cultural memory—emphasizing traditional narratives and historical resilience—provides an ideological counterpoint to the revolutionary zeal that sought to undo the past.

This historical contradiction is also evident in the way meritocracy is framed in China. The legacy of Confucian thought, with its emphasis on education and a fair system of examinations starting from ancient civil service tests to today’s Gaokao, stands in stark opposition to the deconstructed scholarly ideals found in periods of intense nationalist fervor. Despite the lofty ideal that talent and hard work should naturally translate into social mobility, modern practices often reveal a gap where access to elite educational resources creates inequality. Thus, the same cultural memory that extols merit and learning sometimes reinforces the very hierarchies and nepotism that leaders vehemently claim to oppose.

Overall, the interplay of nationalist fervor, anti-scholarly impulses, and a deep cultural memory illustrates the enduring complexity of Chinese political identity. Through selective appropriation of history—whether by mimicking the disruptive tactics of earlier autocrats or by reviving Confucian norms to sustain modern governance—the Chinese leadership continuously negotiates its past, imbuing contemporary policy with layers of historical contradiction that reflect both ambition and deep-rooted cultural tradition.

Censorship and the Power of Visual Dissent in Contemporary China

Censorship in contemporary China is not only about controlling written information but also about suppressing powerful visual dissent that challenges the official narrative. One striking example is the fate of the "tankman"—an iconic protester whose image, captured during a moment of defiant resistance, became emblematic of the struggle against state repression. Similarly, another dissident, who boldly hung a banner on Beijing’s Sitong Bridge denouncing Xi Jinping’s rule, demonstrates how a single image or act of visual defiance can quickly become a potent symbol of resistance. These instances remind us that visual expressions have a unique power to galvanize public sentiment, even as the state works diligently to silence them.

The Chinese government employs a multifaceted approach to curb such dissent through what some analysts describe using three main tactics: fear, friction, and flooding. In practice, fear is instilled through strict bans and severe punitive measures against individuals who share or create unsanctioned images. For instance, the disappearance or presumed execution of those involved in creating these visual protest symbols underscores the high personal risks involved. Friction comes into play by deliberately making access to alternative narratives difficult. Tech-savvy citizens are forced to navigate through a maze of restrictions—often resorting to VPNs—to view protest-related images and content, which are heavily obstructed by state censors. Finally, flooding is achieved by saturating state-run media with propagandized visuals that overshadow or distort the narratives emerging from acts of dissent. This barrage not only drowns out counter-narratives but also reinforces the official versions of events.

Together, these strategies illustrate how visual dissent—arguably one of the most compelling forms of protest—is systematically stifled. The power of images to encapsulate complex political and emotional statements poses a constant challenge to the authorities, prompting them to develop increasingly sophisticated methods to maintain control over public discourse. Despite these efforts, the enduring allure of visually striking defiance, as witnessed with the tankman and other similar acts, suggests that such expressions of dissent continue to inspire audiences both within and beyond China’s borders.

Cultural Resilience: Independent Bookstores, Global Narratives, and Technological Innovation

Independent bookstores serve as a powerful symbol of cultural resilience in an era marked by strict censorship and state-controlled narratives. The discussion highlights how, even as Hong Kong witnessed the closure of one of its coolest independent bookstores due to tightening control, a creative spark endures. In response to these pressures, similar venues have sprung up on the global stage—from a hopeful reopening in Upstate New York to experimental “Nowhere Bookstores” in cities like Chiang Mai, Taipei, and The Hague. These examples illustrate that despite repressive forces, diverse spaces for independent thought and free expression continue to thrive, reflecting a broader commitment to cultural and intellectual autonomy.

At the same time, this resilience is interwoven with global narratives that shape public discourse beyond China’s borders. The conversation emphasizes that access to diverse information—be it through books or digital platforms—plays a crucial role in empowering creative minds. While the Chinese government deploys tactics like "friction" (making it difficult to access alternative content) and "flooding" (saturating media with state-approved material) to control political narratives, the youth and tech-savvy individuals find innovative ways, such as bypassing firewalls or using social media, to challenge these limitations. Such efforts not only preserve independent spaces but also contribute to a global exchange of ideas that cross geographic and cultural boundaries.

Technological innovation, meanwhile, adds an intriguing layer to this cultural resilience. The discussion draws parallels between China's controlled narrative environment and technological ecosystems elsewhere. For instance, the development of smart city technologies in Singapore—which include conveniences like real-time parking updates and digitized payments—demonstrates both the seductive and intrusive aspects of modern technological progress. This contrast highlights a dual reality: while technological innovation can streamline daily life and promote openness, it also holds the potential to reinforce state control when leveraged for surveillance or propaganda.

In combining the struggles of independent bookstores, the dynamics of global narratives, and the rapid pace of technological change, the narrative underscores an enduring commitment to cultural resilience. Despite an environment that often discourages dissent and curtails free expression, the creative spirit remains undimmed—a testament to how cultural institutions and modern innovations continue to carve out spaces for independent thought and open dialogue.

Xi Jinping’s Era: Black Box Politics, Nationalism, and the Erosion of Journalistic Safety

Under Xi Jinping’s era, Chinese politics has taken on an increasingly opaque character—a “black box” in which decision-making and power struggles have become almost impenetrable. Unlike earlier times when subtle cues of internal factional alignments and personal loyalties provided some insight into the workings of the Communist Party, Xi’s leadership has deepened the mystery surrounding the party’s inner dynamics. Commentators like James Palmer have noted that the signals which once offered a glimpse into the hierarchy have faded, leaving observers uncertain about who truly holds influence within the regime. This opacity not only complicates external analysis but also reinforces a centralized, controlled narrative that bolsters Xi’s image as the undisputed leader.

Nationalism has emerged as another defining element of Xi Jinping’s governance. In crafting a narrative that balances historical pride with modern challenges, Xi has tapped into deep-seated feelings of national humiliation and resilience. His public remarks and policies often underscore themes of self-reliance and resistance to external pressures, drawing on cultural symbols and historical memories to rally support. This nationalist sentiment is not merely rhetorical—it serves as a potent tool for legitimizing the party’s authority in an era marked by global economic tensions and regional disputes. The leadership’s focus on projecting strength has also been a key factor in its handling of contentious issues like the trade war with the United States and the delicate balance over Taiwan.

Alongside these internal consolidations, the erosion of journalistic safety has become a notable characteristic of Xi’s rule. Journalists and intellectuals who attempt to question or criticize sensitive subjects, such as the Tiananmen events or policies in Xinjiang, now face significant risks. Personal accounts illustrate how probing foreign researchers and media figures encounter problems ranging from difficulties in securing visas to more direct measures of silencing dissent. While Hong Kong once offered a relatively safe haven for provocative commentary, recent years have seen the mainland become markedly more restrictive, with state control tightening around public discourse. These developments collectively underline how the combination of black box politics and fervent nationalism under Xi Jinping is reshaping not only the internal political landscape but also the broader environment for free expression in China.

U.S.-China Trade War: Leadership Dynamics, Tariff Tactics, and Economic Narratives

In examining the leadership dynamics that have shaped the U.S.-China trade war, a central theme emerges around the contrasting styles of Xi Jinping and political figures like Donald Trump. Xi’s approach is marked by a methodical, calculated demeanor that reinforces China’s cultural legacy and its commitment to a disciplined national narrative. While Trump’s rhetoric was often unpredictable and blunt, Xi has sought to project an image of responsibility and self-reliance, intertwining historical pride with modern economic strategies.

Specific examples of this leadership dynamic are evident in the tit-for-tat tariff tactics adopted by both sides. The Trump administration imposed steep tariffs on Chinese imports as a means of countering what it perceived as unfair trade practices, prompting a swift and deliberate response from Xi. In retaliation, China implemented its own set of tariffs and put restrictions on the export of key resources. These measures are not just economic moves; they serve as a powerful statement that underscores both nations’ desire to reinforce their respective national narratives. For Xi, these actions are part of a broader strategy to remind the Chinese public—and the world—of China’s long history of overcoming adversity and resisting external pressures.

The economic narrative underlying these tariff exchanges is deeply entwined with historical memory and national identity. Xi’s public remarks often highlight themes of self-reliance, perseverance, and the need to rebuild national pride in the face of external challenges. This narrative draws parallels to earlier periods of humiliation and recovery in Chinese history, suggesting that the trade war is less about specific economic numbers and more about asserting a resilient, culturally rooted spirit. The interplay between leadership style, economic tactics, and historical narratives provides a nuanced backdrop to the trade war, revealing it as a multidimensional conflict where policy decisions echo broader themes of national transformation and identity.

Overall, the U.S.-China trade war, as framed by these leadership dynamics, is not merely a dispute over tariffs and trade deficits. It involves a calculated display of power that reinforces internal legitimacy, projects strength on the international stage, and continues to influence how both nations position themselves within the global economic order.

Rising Nationalism and Strategic Ambiguity: The Enduring Legacy of Hong Kong

Jeffrey Wasserstrom’s analysis captures how rising nationalism and strategic ambiguity define contemporary Chinese politics, with the legacy of Hong Kong serving as a powerful emblem of these forces. He notes that Hong Kong’s unique history—rooted in its colonial past and later integrated into China through the “one country, two systems” framework—continues to influence Beijing’s domestic and international posture. This legacy underscores the inherent tension between a nationalist drive to assert strength and the diplomatic need to manage historical narratives that are both contested and deeply symbolic.

Wasserstrom illustrates that the lasting impact of Hong Kong is not just about legal arrangements or economic ties but also about shaping national identity. By selectively embracing symbols like the Great Wall or leveraging Hong Kong’s New Territories debate, China navigates a space between asserting its nationalist credentials and maintaining strategic ambiguity in its international power plays. Such moves mirror the calculated leadership style of Xi Jinping, who, while reinforcing nationalist fervor, also operates within a framework that carefully manages historical legacies and dissent. In this context, Hong Kong becomes a stage on which the drama of modern nationalism unfolds—a case study of how historical agreements continue to inform and complicate current geopolitical strategies.

This dynamic is further evidenced by Hong Kong’s evolving role in promoting creative expressions of identity and resistance. Despite tightening control and uncertainty over its future, the spirit of Hong Kong—as a symbol of open debate and innovative protest—persists both within the region and in the international arena. The city’s experience reflects how cultural resilience and national pride are intertwined, influencing not only domestic policies but also the broader narratives about China’s role in global affairs. Overall, Wasserstrom’s insights invite us to consider Hong Kong’s enduring influence as a vivid reminder of the complex interplay between nationalism, historical legacy, and the strategic ambiguity that characterizes China’s contemporary political landscape.

The Unpredictable Journey of Social Movements and Revolutionary Change

Social movements in modern China—and indeed across the world—follow a path that is far from linear, marked by unexpected twists and unpredictable outcomes. As noted in discussions on the unpredictable journey of social movements, the value of these struggles is not always immediately reflected in sweeping political change. Instead, the process is gradual and incremental: each protest, no matter how seemingly isolated or unsuccessful at first, acts as a seed of ideological change that can inspire future generations. The narrative draws parallels with examples like Vaclav Havel’s enduring legacy, where the spirit of defiance and hope outlasted immediate political setbacks. Protesters in regions such as Eastern and Central Europe, as well as in places like Taiwan under martial law, have shown that even when the fruits of resistance take time to materialize, the cumulative impact of these movements eventually reshapes society.

The discussion further highlights that the effects of revolutionary change are complex and sometimes bittersweet. Revolutionary ideals, while capable of igniting broad enthusiasm, also carry the risk of unintended consequences. Historical episodes—such as the Russian Revolution, which ultimately led to the excesses seen under Stalin—serve as a stark reminder that the path to transformation can be fraught with both promise and peril. In the case of Hong Kong or dissenting voices in Iran, even when immediate political victories remain elusive, the persistence of protest contributes to a slowly evolving dialogue about freedom, democracy, and national identity.

Ultimately, the unpredictable journey of social movements underscores how change rarely follows a straight road. Rather than achieving instant, dramatic transformations, movements steadily accumulate a reservoir of ideas and energy that gradually shift the political and cultural landscape. The persistence of these movements, even when facing repression or setbacks, illustrates a fundamental truth: transformative societal change is often the result of a long, uneven process of continuous, local resistance and the unwavering belief in a better future.

From Imperial Concessions to Confucian Revival: Tracing China’s Modern Transformation

From the era of imperial concessions to the recent revival of Confucian ideals, China’s modern transformation reflects a complex interplay of foreign pressures, revolutionary fervor, and deep-rooted cultural traditions. In the wake of events like the Boxer Rebellion, China was forced to confront its vulnerability as foreign powers imposed unequal treaties and carved out spheres of influence. This period of humiliation spurred a national rejection of the old imperialist order and paved the way for new political ideas. Chinese intellectuals and leaders, disillusioned by the concessions granted to Western powers, began to embrace anti-imperialist ideologies, looking to figures like Lenin whose Marxist critique of imperialism resonated deeply with their own struggles.

As Chinese thinkers absorbed Marxist ideas, their vision of a new society took shape in the unlikely alliance between a small Communist Party and the broader nationalist movement led by Sun Yat-sen. This fusion of ideologies was marked by a tension between revolutionary change and traditional values. While the Nationalists, led by Chiang Kai-shek, were often seen as upholding Confucian traditions that favored a narrow elite, Mao Zedong’s approach was radically different. Mao mobilized the masses, valorizing disorder and the potential for dramatic societal transformation—a stark departure from the orderly social hierarchies rooted in Confucian thought.

Fast forward to the present day, and the legacy of these historical currents is evident in the leadership style of Xi Jinping. Xi’s tenure is characterized by a deliberate synthesis of revolutionary zeal and a revival of China’s ancient traditions. Echoing aspects of both Chiang and Mao, Xi’s regime reclaims elements of Confucian ideology—a reminder of China’s long-standing embrace of hierarchical yet reciprocal social relationships—in order to legitimize the modern state. At the same time, the strong, centralized, one-party control he exercises reflects the enduring influence of the earlier revolutionary period. This blend of state control, national pride, and cultural conservatism illustrates how modern China continues to negotiate between its past of imperial concessions and revolutionary transformation, channeling both to build a narrative of resurgence and continuity.

Watch the original video